Obvious: Tiny Girls Not as Attractive as “Big Bottom” Girls

Share This Post:
[del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Google] [Reddit] [StumbleUpon] [Technorati] [Twitter] [Windows Live] [Yahoo!] [Email]

"Sexy Women", provided by a simple Google Image Search

"Sexy Women", provided by a simple Google Image Search

Male students at St Andrews University were asked to rate female faces for attractiveness and health.

The study found that girls with an average weight and build were ranked as being the most attractive and healthy.

Researchers said the findings sent out a strong message to young women who believe being underweight is considered to be attractive.


Hasn’t the Queen song Fat Bottom girls taught us anything? Girls like those on the left are the ones men all over the world are after; sure they are trim and slim – but they also have curves. BeyoncĂ©, Shakira, Pamela Anderson, Angelina Jolie, Vida Guerra… these are not tiny women. I’ve been personally attracted to a few smaller women in my time, but my blood boils at the sight of a curvy woman with the right moves. So this study spells out what we already know. Duh.

via BBC NEWS | UK | Scotland | Edinburgh, East and Fife | Size zero girls ‘less attractive’.

No related posts.

Tags: , , ,


Rate This Post:

1 Star2 Stars3 Stars4 Stars5 Stars (3 votes, average: 4.67 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

One Response to “Obvious: Tiny Girls Not as Attractive as “Big Bottom” Girls”

  1. dougwomach Says:

    I think they look very hot. Very cute sexy bodies.

Leave a Reply

*

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree